Critique about putting a hyper child under medication to make them Assignment

Critique about putting a hyper babe under music to make them calm - Assignment ExampleDaniels mother noticed that he was active when he became nine months old. Daniels mother noted a connection between certain foods and Daniels level of activity. At first, the doctors dismissed the connection between Daniels hyperactivity. Regardless, Daniels mother decided to head research and determine if regimen contributes to hyperactivity. Currently, Daniel is a calm boy because his mother realized a diet that was suitable for him. Daniels story is a testament that there is no need put a hyperactive child on medication to have him or her calm.It is well known that medication incessantly comes with side effects regardless of its purpose. It is wrong to put a young child on medication just because it is difficult to deal with his or her hyperactivity. The drugs do not even treat the hyperactivity. They are meant keep them calm for a specific period. Subjecting a child to medication for a n atural condition exactly predisposes them to many dangers associated with the different drugs provided for hyperactivity. Daniels success story is evidence that there are other ship canal to control hyperactivity children without having to put them through a lifetime of medication.In conclusion, no child deserves to be assailable to the potential side effects of the medication at a very tender age because of a natural condition. The dangers of getting used of drugs are much greater than the trouble that a hyperactive child creates. Therefore, parents should emulate what Daniels mother did. She found alternative ways to help hyperactive children without